<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Was the 327 v8 ever an option in a \&#8217;69 Chevy truck?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chevytruckshq.com/was-the-327-v8-ever-an-option-in-a-69-chevy-truck/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chevytruckshq.com/was-the-327-v8-ever-an-option-in-a-69-chevy-truck/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 10:20:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: musiclicker</title>
		<link>http://www.chevytruckshq.com/was-the-327-v8-ever-an-option-in-a-69-chevy-truck/comment-page-1/#comment-1213</link>
		<dc:creator>musiclicker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 18:59:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chevytruckshq.com/was-the-327-v8-ever-an-option-in-a-69-chevy-truck/#comment-1213</guid>
		<description>I would think the 327 was put in some trucks in 69.  I would think its a 305/307, or a 350 which looks just like a 327.  In the V-8 sector was the 305/307, 350, 396, 427, and 454.  Just look on the pad on the passenger side front of the engine, just below the head and you will find a flat place that has some numbers and letters stamped into the block.  These will tell you what the engine code is.  You can use this code to find out what is in the monster.  The only small blocks that were put into trucks that I know of was the 305, 307, and the 350.  Hope this helps!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would think the 327 was put in some trucks in 69.  I would think its a 305/307, or a 350 which looks just like a 327.  In the V-8 sector was the 305/307, 350, 396, 427, and 454.  Just look on the pad on the passenger side front of the engine, just below the head and you will find a flat place that has some numbers and letters stamped into the block.  These will tell you what the engine code is.  You can use this code to find out what is in the monster.  The only small blocks that were put into trucks that I know of was the 305, 307, and the 350.  Hope this helps!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sethle99</title>
		<link>http://www.chevytruckshq.com/was-the-327-v8-ever-an-option-in-a-69-chevy-truck/comment-page-1/#comment-1212</link>
		<dc:creator>sethle99</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 07:26:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chevytruckshq.com/was-the-327-v8-ever-an-option-in-a-69-chevy-truck/#comment-1212</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d say that it&#039;s most likely a 350.  I thought too that 68 was the last year for the 327.  It&#039;s not unlikely that someone stuck a 327 in the truck later though, if the original engine wore out.  

And for the record, for pete&#039;s sake, compression has nothing to do with displacement!!!!!!  Also, the current 5.3 engine works out to closer to 325 cubic inches, and shares nothing with the old small block.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d say that it&#8217;s most likely a 350.  I thought too that 68 was the last year for the 327.  It&#8217;s not unlikely that someone stuck a 327 in the truck later though, if the original engine wore out.  </p>
<p>And for the record, for pete&#8217;s sake, compression has nothing to do with displacement!!!!!!  Also, the current 5.3 engine works out to closer to 325 cubic inches, and shares nothing with the old small block.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phantom</title>
		<link>http://www.chevytruckshq.com/was-the-327-v8-ever-an-option-in-a-69-chevy-truck/comment-page-1/#comment-1211</link>
		<dc:creator>Phantom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 11:20:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chevytruckshq.com/was-the-327-v8-ever-an-option-in-a-69-chevy-truck/#comment-1211</guid>
		<description>i&#039;d say a 350. sorry to burst your bubble.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i&#8217;d say a 350. sorry to burst your bubble.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael s</title>
		<link>http://www.chevytruckshq.com/was-the-327-v8-ever-an-option-in-a-69-chevy-truck/comment-page-1/#comment-1210</link>
		<dc:creator>michael s</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 02:36:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chevytruckshq.com/was-the-327-v8-ever-an-option-in-a-69-chevy-truck/#comment-1210</guid>
		<description>68 last of 327 in a truck and god 396 my ass anybody ever hear of the 402 -</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>68 last of 327 in a truck and god 396 my ass anybody ever hear of the 402 -</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rockintrain397</title>
		<link>http://www.chevytruckshq.com/was-the-327-v8-ever-an-option-in-a-69-chevy-truck/comment-page-1/#comment-1209</link>
		<dc:creator>rockintrain397</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 07:21:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chevytruckshq.com/was-the-327-v8-ever-an-option-in-a-69-chevy-truck/#comment-1209</guid>
		<description>I think the 350 V8 option was used for the &#039;69 Chevy truck instead of the 327 V8 but I&#039;m not very certain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the 350 V8 option was used for the &#8216;69 Chevy truck instead of the 327 V8 but I&#8217;m not very certain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: schnauz200</title>
		<link>http://www.chevytruckshq.com/was-the-327-v8-ever-an-option-in-a-69-chevy-truck/comment-page-1/#comment-1208</link>
		<dc:creator>schnauz200</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 20:12:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chevytruckshq.com/was-the-327-v8-ever-an-option-in-a-69-chevy-truck/#comment-1208</guid>
		<description>If I remember correctly, the 283 was gone by 1968 and was replaced by the 307. I think 1968 was the last year for the 327 also.  The 350 was introduced in 1969 &amp; that is probably what your one ton has in it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I remember correctly, the 283 was gone by 1968 and was replaced by the 307. I think 1968 was the last year for the 327 also.  The 350 was introduced in 1969 &#038; that is probably what your one ton has in it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vulcan 1</title>
		<link>http://www.chevytruckshq.com/was-the-327-v8-ever-an-option-in-a-69-chevy-truck/comment-page-1/#comment-1207</link>
		<dc:creator>Vulcan 1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 15:11:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chevytruckshq.com/was-the-327-v8-ever-an-option-in-a-69-chevy-truck/#comment-1207</guid>
		<description>1969 saw a new V8 engine: a 255 hp 350 in³ (5.7 L). 

The 1969 pickups had a redesigned grille featuring a wide, horizontal aluminum grille bar with the Chevrolet name prominently displayed. The only new pickup model was the one-ton Fleetside. It featured a 133 inch wheelbase chassis and a nine foot box (104 inches inside length). Fleetside pickups continued to offer either steel or wood floors. The engine
line was revised by dropping the 327 V8 and replacing it with Chevrolet&#039;s beloved 350.

Production: 1967–1972 
Engine: 283 in³ (4.6 L) Small-block V8
307 in³ (5.0 L) Small-block V8
350 in³ (5.7 L) Small-block V8
396 in³ (6.5 L) Big-block V8

In 1968, the 283 in³ (4.6 L) V8 was replaced with a 307 in³ (5.0 L) and a 310 hp 396 in³ (6.5 L) V8 was offered for the first time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1969 saw a new V8 engine: a 255 hp 350 in³ (5.7 L). </p>
<p>The 1969 pickups had a redesigned grille featuring a wide, horizontal aluminum grille bar with the Chevrolet name prominently displayed. The only new pickup model was the one-ton Fleetside. It featured a 133 inch wheelbase chassis and a nine foot box (104 inches inside length). Fleetside pickups continued to offer either steel or wood floors. The engine<br />
line was revised by dropping the 327 V8 and replacing it with Chevrolet&#8217;s beloved 350.</p>
<p>Production: 1967–1972<br />
Engine: 283 in³ (4.6 L) Small-block V8<br />
307 in³ (5.0 L) Small-block V8<br />
350 in³ (5.7 L) Small-block V8<br />
396 in³ (6.5 L) Big-block V8</p>
<p>In 1968, the 283 in³ (4.6 L) V8 was replaced with a 307 in³ (5.0 L) and a 310 hp 396 in³ (6.5 L) V8 was offered for the first time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yugie29</title>
		<link>http://www.chevytruckshq.com/was-the-327-v8-ever-an-option-in-a-69-chevy-truck/comment-page-1/#comment-1206</link>
		<dc:creator>yugie29</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 15:35:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chevytruckshq.com/was-the-327-v8-ever-an-option-in-a-69-chevy-truck/#comment-1206</guid>
		<description>The 327 was available for that year.  Most industrial trucks had either the 250 ci straight six or the 283 V8.  With the one ton, four speed you probably have the 283 ci.  Which will look almost identical to the 327.  Do you have a triangle shaped stamp on the front of each head or two rounded humps?  Triangle=283. Double rounded humps=327.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 327 was available for that year.  Most industrial trucks had either the 250 ci straight six or the 283 V8.  With the one ton, four speed you probably have the 283 ci.  Which will look almost identical to the 327.  Do you have a triangle shaped stamp on the front of each head or two rounded humps?  Triangle=283. Double rounded humps=327.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: etxcpl4fun62</title>
		<link>http://www.chevytruckshq.com/was-the-327-v8-ever-an-option-in-a-69-chevy-truck/comment-page-1/#comment-1205</link>
		<dc:creator>etxcpl4fun62</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 05:30:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chevytruckshq.com/was-the-327-v8-ever-an-option-in-a-69-chevy-truck/#comment-1205</guid>
		<description>im sure you could.. 327 was a popular engine from the early 60&#039;s on thhru the 80&#039;s  ..its a great performance engine</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>im sure you could.. 327 was a popular engine from the early 60&#8217;s on thhru the 80&#8217;s  ..its a great performance engine</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wicked Mickey</title>
		<link>http://www.chevytruckshq.com/was-the-327-v8-ever-an-option-in-a-69-chevy-truck/comment-page-1/#comment-1204</link>
		<dc:creator>Wicked Mickey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 06:25:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chevytruckshq.com/was-the-327-v8-ever-an-option-in-a-69-chevy-truck/#comment-1204</guid>
		<description>327 was the displacement for a 350 before the compression was lowered.  It is also the CID (cubic inch displacement for the current 5.3 liter V8)  Sounds right for a &#039;69.  The more things change, the more they stay the same.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>327 was the displacement for a 350 before the compression was lowered.  It is also the CID (cubic inch displacement for the current 5.3 liter V8)  Sounds right for a &#8216;69.  The more things change, the more they stay the same.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

